Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Grovewood home improvements
0845 470 1977
Keeping you warm in the Winter and cool in the Summer
 
 
Friday, 5th December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the OS-Chichester Observer site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

VIDEO: Fury as the axe falls on St Richard's Hospital in Chichester



View Video
Download Video

Video

VIDEO: Click to watch, double-click for full screen
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 May 2008
Staff and patients have been left devastated, shocked and angry after health bosses announced St Richard's Hospital will be stripped of many of its key services and downgraded.
Campaigners have described the news as a 'tragedy', with bosses choosing 'the wrong hospital' to become the county's main hospital.

"It is a travesty that political correctness has overtaken commonsense," said David Allen, a general and vascular surgeon at the Chichester hospital.

"It is a tragedy for St Richard's and the people it serves."

Under the recommendation announced yesterday, Worthing will be the county's only major general hospital, with the only fully-fledged A&E, consultant maternity services, major surgery and inpatient children's services.

To see a video of PCT chief executive John Wilderspin talking about the recommendation click on the green button.

The Chichester hospital will lose its specialist services, which will be centralised to Worthing – forcing many patients and visitors to embark on journeys of more than an hour to reach Portsmouth or Worthing.

The main reasons for the decision going Worthing's way were:

It is a more deprived area.

It has a bigger catchment population and fewer people will have further to travel for services.

There has been a lot of investment in Portsmouth so it can cope with an influx of patients from the Chichester area.

"The PCT have failed to accept that St Richard's has a better quality of medical care, far and away the better management and the better estate to expand," Mr Allen said.

Campaigners are also angry the PCT has given so much weight to the 'perceived deprivation' in Worthing while doing little work on the impact on rural deprivation.

PCT bosses have also decided not to take ambulance response times or the impact of holiday-makers into consideration, arguing there was no evidence either Chichester or Worthing is more affected by either issue.

"The PCT decided that blue-light times should not be part of the decision-making process, and yet it is patients in the north of the downs, West Wittering and the more rural areas who will not only be picked up late by the ambulances, but will have further to travel for emergency care," Support St Richard's campaigner Abigail Rowe said.

"If you live on the Manhood Peninsula or in the downs, you will have average journey times of over an hour which could be the difference between life and death," she said.

St Richard's chief executive Andrew Liles briefed staff throughout yesterday (Thursday) and said that while he was disappointed, it was now essential the hospital worked closely with Worthing for the good of all patients.

"I want to reassure our patients, staff and wider public that our priority will continue to be the well-being of our patients," he said.

"I also want to thank the public and the campaign group for the tremendous ongoing support they have shown the hospital throughout this difficult period."

The PCT's board is meeting near Gatwick on Wednesday, June 4, and is expected to accept the recommendation.

"We have less than a week to make them see sense and recommend St Richard's to be the major general hospital," said Mrs Rowe.

"Protest with us at the meeting at the Copthorne Hotel at 2pm on Wednesday, June 4."

The campaign still has a limited number of seats available on its coach to Copthorne.

To book your place email or call 07802 783604.


What do you think? Click here to send a letter or leave a comment below.

Click here to go back to Chichester news
Click here to go back to Bognor Regis news
Click here to go back to Midhurst and Petworth news

To tell us where in the world you are reading this story click on the link below to add yourself to our readers' map.

MAP

The full article contains 648 words and appears in OS-Chichester Observer newspaper.
Page 1 of 2

  • Last Updated: 29 May 2008 10:14 AM
  • Source: OS-Chichester Observer
  • Location: Chichester
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Whyismynameinuse?,

chichester 28/05/2008 19:03:34
What an absolute farce, I'd love to know which catchment area the people who made this decision live in (wouldn't it be a strange coincidence if most of them lived in Worthing ???)

And didn't Worthing get flooded out last summer ? not very sensible to put all your eggs in a leaky basket is it !

I hope that when the decision makers read about the first person to die in the back of an ambulance on the A27 that would otherwise have lived, they will be able to snuggle up in their beds at night and sleep the sleep of the righteous knowing that they had made the correct decision.

Anyone who has had to endure the lovely bottlenecks on the A27, particularly the 10-15 minutre standstill at Arundel will realise that only a bunch of deranged gibbons could possibly think that this was a good idea... Actually, that is a bit strong, I wish to apologise to gibbons everywhere for lumping them in with this lot who are so dense that light must bend around them.

So what is next ?, petitions and protests haven't worked. I think the only recourse is planned "civil disobedience" I would suggest a general strike by all residents of Chichester, perhaps if we all refused to pay our council tax the PCT would be persuaded very quickly to see the error of their ways.

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.