Stripping Southern services from Govia Thameslink Railway would not end the year-long dispute with rail unions, according to the Government’s Transport Secretary.
The rail operator, which also runs Thameslink and Gatwick Express trains, has been mired in a lengthy and bitter dispute with its staff for the last 15 months over the introduction of driver-only operation on Southern routes.
In an exclusive interview yesterday (Wednesday July 19), Transport Secretary Chris Grayling made it clear he wanted to see both sides reach a deal as quickly as possible for commuters.
He admitted Southern’s performance had been ‘appalling’ in 2016, which was down not only to industrial action, but also to the ‘dysfunctional way the railway has been run’.
The Government has faced repeated calls to strip GTR of its contract and take Southern services back into public ownership temporarily, similar to what happened with the East Coast network in 2009, before finding a new company to run the franchise.
In response Mr Grayling said: “People seem to think that by getting rid of Govia we would solve the dispute. We don’t. My focus is on making the railway perform better and trying to get a resolution to the dispute.”
The rail operator has been dogged by bad publicity since taking over Southern services in 2015, with passengers facing repeated delays and cancellations.
However the Transport Secretary pointed out that performance has improved dramatically since the turn of the year until train drivers’ union ASLEF called a ban on overtime working in June, which forced Southern to cut services through a revised timetable.
Part of the Government’s modernisation plan is to roll out driver-only operation, which makes drivers responsible for opening and closing train doors rather than guards, who are then transferred to the roles of on-board supervisors.
In Mr Grayling’s words this was ‘not about cost-cutting or getting rid of jobs’, but delivering a ‘smarter’ rail system.
He described how unions such as the RMT ‘seem to be utterly intransigent in not accepting modern ways of working’, and was angry that a deal accepted by drivers working on Thameslink trains had been rejected by ASLEF’s Southern members.
The £60,683 offer represented a 23.8 per cent rise in basic pay for working a four-day 35-hour week.
Speaking at the Department for Transport’s headquarters on Wednesday morning, he called strikes by both ASLEF and the RMT planned for the first week of August ‘politically motivated’ in the wake of the general election result ‘egged on by the Labour Party’s leadership’.
Asked if he would intervene directly in the dispute, Mr Grayling claimed there had been ‘no shortage of attempts by us to resolve things’ as they looked to encourage both sides to reach a deal, but he did not see how ‘me getting involved will make things better’.
He said: “I do not believe that holding a grand public confrontation with the unions, because they will make it that, is actually going to help resolve this.
“What I think will resolve it is quiet work between the company and union members on the ground who I do not think actually want to be doing the action, and put pressure on the leadership to reach an agreement.”
But hours later both unions suspended strike action and took up Mr Grayling’s offer of fresh talks.
Mick Whelan, ASLEF general secretary, said: “ASLEF is committed to resolving matters as soon as possible while safeguarding the interests of our members, and the safety of passengers particularly those with disabilities.”
A spokesman for GTR added: “We are delighted on behalf of our passengers. We truly hope that a resolution can be found once and for all.”
Mr Grayling singled out the company’s chief operating officer Nick Brown for praise, but would not provide a commitment to Govia’s future.
He said: “I think that Nick has provided really good and improved leadership. I think that there has been a real improvement in performance since the end of last year. I have said that I think there is a strong case for doing the franchise differently going forward but right now I’m much more focused on getting the existing company, the existing workforce, and the existing union leadership to sort things out.”