Brexit: What MPs are saying and what they really mean

With only six weeks until Brexit is due on March 29 I thought it would be helpful to explain what MPs are currently saying and what they really mean.

Take ‘no-deal’ off the table – usually demanded by MPs who have refused to back a deal. Code for delaying Brexit or even ditching it altogether. There’s no other way to prevent ‘no-deal’. Unless of course they finally decide to vote for a deal.

What do MPs really mean when talking about Brexit?

What do MPs really mean when talking about Brexit?

People’s vote – a euphemism for a second referendum. Usually demanded by MPs who voted for the first referendum, and stood on party manifestos promising to implement the result, but have now changed their minds.

Running down the clock – the accusation that the Prime Minister is building pressure on MPs to decide between ‘no-deal’ and her deal. Usually made by MPs who have systematically opposed any deal for months while the clock runs down.

Short-term disruption – the admission by proponents of ‘no-deal’ that leaving without a deal could damage our economy. Usually made by MPs who don’t have significant manufacturers or ports in their constituencies.

WTO Rules – putting tariffs, taxes on goods we export or import, on half of our trade where currently there are none. We try and do free trade deals with other countries to avoid WTO Rules, but apparently now they’re a great thing.

|Also in the news - a helicopter was called in to search for a man after it was reported someone had been seen with a shotgun near Chichester; huge public opposition is being mounted against plans to build a new gypsy and traveller site on the border of Mid Sussex and Crawley; and families of children resting in Durrington Cemetery have been left ‘gobsmacked and heartbroken’ over attempts to remove tributes from the children’s section|

The Withdrawal Treaty can’t be amended – usually asserted by MPs who don’t want to support the deal, however it is amended. In fact, as I pointed out in the Commons this week, Ireland secured changes to the Lisbon Treaty after it was agreed, by way of a legally-binding protocol.

The sensible way forward to implement the referendum decision is for the EU to agree changes to address concerns over the Irish backstop, and MPs then to agree the deal.

We would avoid the risks associated with ‘no-deal’, end the uncertainty, and the UK would then leave the EU but with a pragmatic transition period.

We would then complete a new free trade deal with the EU, forging a close economic and security partnership, but control our borders, our money and our laws.

Four out of five MPs voted less than two years ago to trigger Article 50, beginning the timetabled process of leaving the EU. It is time to stop playing parliamentary games and honour the democratic decision of the British people.

If you would like to get in touch with me, please email me at nick@nickherbert.com

---

Benefit from an ongoing discount on your Herald or Littlehampton Gazette by joining our voucher membership scheme. Once you’ve subscribed we’ll send you dated vouchers which can be exchanged for your paper at any news outlet. To save money on your Herald or Littlehampton Gazette simply click here.