Well drilling in Sussex must be properly regulated

Last week there was a short debate in the House of Commons about the Government's proposals to change the planning procedures for onshore drilling for oil and gas.
Proposals for fracking have been particularly controversialProposals for fracking have been particularly controversial
Proposals for fracking have been particularly controversial

The Government has been concerned that the planning process to allow even exploratory drilling has been too slow.

| Also in the news – the county council leader has urged residents to welcome Velo South participants despite an eleventh-hour legal threat to the controversial cycle event around the South Downs; and West Sussex NHS staff question first parking fees increase in a decade |

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Proposals for fracking – the process injecting liquid at high pressure into subterranean rock to extract shale gas – have been particularly controversial.

Nick Herbert in the House of Commons debateNick Herbert in the House of Commons debate
Nick Herbert in the House of Commons debate

Planning applications for shale gas exploration wells are now taking over a year, and many are being rejected.

The Government has made two proposals. First, shale production would be treated as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects, so final planning decisions would be taken by the Government rather than councils.

Second, conventional (non-fracking) drilling would be treated as ‘permitted development’. This would remove the current requirement on companies to apply for planning permission when drilling or sampling a well. I have particular reservations about this, as I know do many of my constituents.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

I believe the ‘below ground’ activity of drilling, including by fracking, can be regulated to ensure it will not harm the environment. My much bigger concern is about the ‘above ground’ activity, especially lorry movements.

I think it is appropriate that West Sussex County Council is able to assess things like the impact of lorry movements on local communities.

I don’t think a major process as disruptive as drilling can be classed as permitted development which doesn’t need planning permission, akin to putting up a garden shed.

There are a number of conventional oil wells in my constituency which operate without public concern because they are sensibly located, for instance near Storrington. In over 13 years as an MP I have not received a single complaint about these.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

However, new wells have been proposed in locations which would mean significant disruption to villages.

The proposed exploratory well between Kirdford and Wisborough Green was rightly rejected precisely because of the traffic issues. These have to be assessed properly, and local concerns must be heard.

In the Commons debate, I invited the Minister to look again at the proposals, which I believe go too far.

I don’t hold with those who have an ideological objection to any form of oil or gas extraction, but drilling must be properly regulated. We can’t allow the countryside to become carelessly industrialised.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

If you would like to get in touch with me, please email me at nick@nickherbert.com

---

Benefit from an ongoing discount on your Herald or Littlehampton Gazette by joining our voucher membership scheme. Once you’ve subscribed we’ll send you dated vouchers which can be exchanged for your paper at any news outlet. To save money on your Herald or Littlehampton Gazette simply click here.