Plans to convert historical monument into home on Chichester border refused

Plans to convert a monument, dating back to the 1700s, into a residential dwelling have been turned down.
The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153143001The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153143001
The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153143001

The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly.

However, the South Downs National Park Authority has refused the application, on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’, due to the intended scale, design and appearance.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A spokesperson for the planning authority said: “[It] would not preserve or enhance the heritage significance of the listed building and its setting.

The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153133001The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153133001
The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153133001

“The proposed works to the building would detract from its special architectural and historic interest and its setting, and would not make a positive contribution to the area and the cultural heritage of the National Park.

“Furthermore, the proposal would result in less than substantial harm to the listed building and no sufficient public benefit has been demonstrated to outweigh this harm.”

It was also stated that ‘insufficient information’ had been provided to justify the impact of the proposals.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The application had been submitted by Mark Talbot, who has owned the monument since 1987.

The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153153001The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153153001
The owner of Racton Monument, based in Hares Lane, near Stoughton had requested planning permission to convert the Grade II Listed, derelict folly. The application was turned down on the grounds that the change-of-use would represent an ‘unsympathetic form of development’ SUS-200309-153153001

In the planning documents, Mr Talbot said Racton Tower had been unused for a ‘considerable time’ and the proposals would have meant it could be enjoyed and used in the future ‘in accordance with the principles set out by Historic England’.

The applicant also claimed that the tower had, ‘for many years’, been a focal point of ‘undesirable and sometimes illegal gatherings’ as well as suffering from fly tipping, and dumping of cars.

Despite planning consent for these specific works having previously been granted by Chichester District Council, this permission expired in April 2013, and the fresh application was determined by South Downs National Park Authority ‘given the significance of the monument to local views, landscape and cultural heritage’.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

What are your thoughts about the decision to refuse the application? Let us know by commenting on our Facebook page

A message from the Editor, Gary Shipton:

In order for us to continue to provide high quality and trusted local news, I am asking you to please purchase a copy of our newspapers.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our local valued advertisers - and consequently the advertising that we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you helping us to provide you with news and information by buying a copy of our newspapers.

Our journalists are highly trained and our content is independently regulated by IPSO to some of the most rigorous standards in the world. But being your eyes and ears comes at a price. So we need your support more than ever to buy our newspapers during this crisis.

Stay safe, and best wishes