Sceptical response after fresh calls for underpass in Chichester

Observer readers have responded to fresh proposals for an underpass to be built beneath the city’s railway line and and for both level crossings to be removed.
Richard Plowman and Brian Raincock from Gateway Plus teamRichard Plowman and Brian Raincock from Gateway Plus team
Richard Plowman and Brian Raincock from Gateway Plus team

A masterplan for the area, stretching from the law courts to Canal Wharf, was agreed by Chichester District Council back in 2017.

On Tuesday and Wednesday, members of the Gateway Plus team stood by the level crossing, talking to and handing out leaflets to passers-by about the benefits of an underpass. Read more here

The idea sparked debate amongst Observer readers.

Richard Plowman and Brian Raincock from Gateway Plus teamRichard Plowman and Brian Raincock from Gateway Plus team
Richard Plowman and Brian Raincock from Gateway Plus team
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Commenting on our Facebook page, Andrew Saunderswrote: "It would be staggeringly expensive to do and not affect anything built near it and it will flood. And it could cause even more traffic. I can't see it getting any further than this."

Dave West said: "Having had a brief look at the Chichester Gateway plan, I have to say it is, perhaps, a ‘nice to have’ but our council's money would be better spent in developing initiatives to ensure the existing high streets remain vibrant and shops occupied."

Laura Gibbsagreed. She said: "I'd much rather see the money that would be spent on this was invested into the town centre and the local shops.

"I don't see a problem with how it is now with the level crossings."

Proposed underpass to replace the Basin Road level crossing (photo submitted).Proposed underpass to replace the Basin Road level crossing (photo submitted).
Proposed underpass to replace the Basin Road level crossing (photo submitted).
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Hannah Ridleywrote: "Chichester is turning into a ghost town with most shops closing, why waste money on underpasses the crossings have been fine for years if it's not broken don't fix it."

On the other hand, Jonathan Handford wrote: "I don't know what the right solution would be but 'solving' the problem of the level crossings would be wonderful."

John O'Sullivansaid it would be 'nice not to have the crossings' but the 'expense and distribution wouldn’t be worth it'.

Nick Ridley wrote: "An underpass would be an engineering nightmare and just as impractical as a bridge. A better solution would be to improve the access from the Fishbourne roundabout via Avenue De Chartres and from the Bognor bridge roundabout."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Paul Hubbard and Hamish Spence expressed their fear that an underpass would flood, whilst Sue Hughessaid crossings are safe if people 'keep to the rules'.

What do you think about the proposal for an underpass? Let us know on our Facebook page.